![]() There is some emotional cargo in switching from an inclusive modifier (“Every”) to an exclusive one (“Only”) but nothing anyone would lose sleep over. Currently, the Florida Constitution says this about voting: "Every citizen of the United States who is at least eighteen years of age and who is a permanent resident of the state, if registered as provided by law, shall be an elector of the county where registered.”Īmendment 1, if passed, would change that first word, “Every citizen … ” to “Only a citizen…” That’s it. Start with what Amendment 1 would actually do. More: Big issues and big money set tone for constitutional amendment campaigns That’s not going to change, no matter what voters mark on their ballots.īut there are reasons to consider voting "no." And they start with telling the backer of this amendment that Florida voters aren’t fools, and that they don’t appreciate the dishonest, manipulative intent behind this ballot initiative. And that “yes” vote probably won’t do any harm. Maybe there’s a problem here,” and vote yes … just in case. But as they zip down their ballot, they might pause on Amendment 1 and think, “Huh. Most Floridians, if they think about it, know this. More: Don't forget about those amendments 3 election, no matter how people vote on proposed constitutional Amendment 1. ![]() That’s what the Florida Constitution says right now, and that’s what it will say the day after the Nov. The newspaper has not done so.It’s Civics 101: You have to be a citizen to vote. The spokesman, Andrew Gant, said his agency should not have provided it to The News-Journal this week because of a court order and asked that the News-Journal delete its copy of the video. Meanwhile, a Sheriff's Office spokesman said his agency released the bodycam footage to activist Mark Dickinson, aka James Madison Audits, who posted it to a YouTube page prior to the petition by Schoenbrod and Long. "The Florida Supreme Court has described the right of access to public records as 'the cornerstone of our political culture.'"Īn attorney representing Schoenbrod and Long, Michael Lambert, hasn't responded to requests for comment. "A heightened interest exists with regard to the disclosure of records involving a public agency and its employees," the motion states. Groot's motion cites a court rule allowing any party to request expedited consideration of and ruling on a motion for confidentiality. ![]() The petitioners' "notice for confidentiality" was made on May 18, the same date as the original filing. ![]() One of the government accountability organization's arguments, made in the filing by attorney Lonnie Groot, a Daytona Beach Shores resident and the former city attorney, is that the petitioners' motion is required by rule to be acted upon by a judge within 30 days of its filing. is asking Volusia Circuit Judge Mary Jolley to hold a hearing on the motion to make the petition to the court confidential. The Florida Center for Government Accountability Inc. What that is, exactly, is unknown because the Volusia County Clerk's Office, citing a court rule, has marked much of the case file confidential. Jessica Long filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, essentially asking a judge to order State Attorney R.J. A government accountability nonprofit is attempting to intervene in an attempt to get records, including the original petition, opened.Ī nonprofit government watchdog is seeking to shed some light on a confidential court petition filed by two Daytona Beach Shores police officers embroiled in investigations into their use of a city holding cell to potty train their 3½-year-old son. This is what appears when a user clicks on documents in a Volusia Circuit Court petition filed by Jessica Long and Michael Schoenbrod, two Daytona Beach Shores police officers who placed their 3-year-old child in a jail cell as a potty-training lesson.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |